Did Morality Or Economics Dominate The Debates Over Slavery In The 1850s

The debate over the issues surrounding slavery in the 1850s still rages. Many people have set out to unravel the reason behind the then civil war that saw the shading of blood of a significant number of innocent people. The war was between the Southern and the Northern states, where slavery prevail.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Did Morality Or Economics Dominate The Debates Over Slavery In The 1850s? specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More While the Southern states sought to preserve their prevailing agricultural and slavery ways of life, the Northern states were after nurturing a new way of life, free of slavery. These outstanding differences compelled people to address slavery as a subject majoring on its causes. Among the many causes associated with slavery, political, cultural, moral, and economical causes underscore the major causes. However, as primary sources unfold, virtually all the debates over slavery in t he 1850s were dominated by economics, rather than morals. It is rather interesting to find out that, even from the arguments of those who associate slavery with morals, rather than economics, the issue of economics stands out in their debate. For instance, one reason that explains the stance of the Northerners concerning slavery is that they wanted to nurture unity and free labour against their southern counterparts. Labour and economy remained intertwined in that; the former was a factor that determined the state of the latter. Therefore, building on this argument, it suffices to infer that, the causes of slavery cannot be sufficient without addressing the issue of economics. The entry of the Negros to America was a major cause of the Civil War; a war founded on nothing but slavery. The reason behind the entry of these people was no more than economy based. They played a significant role as far as trade was concerned in those days. Therefore, economics could not be divorced from an y slavery debate for it was the sole issue affecting all the political powers of that time. Scholars single out economical differences between the two states as the cause of the slavery in those days. As the two competed in maintaining their economic statuses, slave trade turned out as one way out. Revealing the economic gain from slavery, the Southerners were deeply rooted on slavery since it was more profitable than any other form of trade. In other words, it boosted their economic well-being significantly. Without slavery, the Southerners’ economy would crumble. There existed another category of people, who claimed that slavery was an outcome of the differences in geographical regions.Advertising Looking for essay on history? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More While some regions remained agriculturally fit, other had rugged landscapes that could not allow any agricultural practise. Following the significant contribution of agriculture in the then economy, the agriculturally challenged regions had to offer labour, sufficient to maintain this economy. As the debates about slavery unfolded, it was all about economy that slavery found its way. In conclusion, 1850s stands out as a period marked by raging debates over slavery. People have pointed out various causes of slavery; some associate it with politics and immorality, while others associate it with culture as well as economics. As the debate over slavery continued, economics remained dominant. Hoarding material possessions is a ghost that has haunted human beings for a long time. Morality could not find its way in at a time when material possessions surpassed human lives. Regardless of what different people perceive the dominant subject surrounding slavery, it is evident that economics and not morality dominated slavery debates in the 1850s. People of that time were not concerned about morality; all they cared was their economical well-being. This essay on Did Morality Or Economics Dominate The Debates Over Slavery In The 1850s? was written and submitted by user Juliana Morse to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Rosa Parks and the Montgomery essays

Rosa Parks and the Montgomery essays Rosa Louise Parks was born Rosa McCauley on February 4, 1913, in Tuskegee, Alabama. She was named after her grandmother, Rose Percival. Rosa was raised by her mother, Leona Edward McCauley, on her grandparents farm at Pine Level, a small community outside Montgomery. Rosa received her primary education in a segregated rural school. In 1924 she enrolled at the private Montgomery Industrial School for Girls known as Miss Whites School. It was so named after its principal and cofounder, Alice L. White. All the students were African-Americans, and all the teachers were white women from the North. She married Raymond Parks and began living in Montgomery, Alabama in 1932. In Montgomery, Rosa and Raymond learned about the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). The NAACP worked to help black people gain their civil rights. In 1943, Rosa joined the Montgomery chapter of the NAACP. She was elected its secretary and assisted the chapters president, Mr. E.D. Nixon. Rosa and Raymond devoted much of their time and energy to the organization. One cause they felt strongly about was the right to vote. On December 1, 1955, in Montgomery, Alabama, Rosa refused to give up her bus seat to a white man. When asked to move to let a white bus rider be seated, she refused. She did not argue, and she did not move. The police were called, and Mrs. Parks was arrested. There were 36 seats on each bus operated by Montgomery City Lines, Inc.. The 10 seats in the front were reserved for whites only. Even if there were no whites on the bus, blacks could not sit in the front seats. Instead they had to sit in the last 10 seats of the bus. The bus drivers could choose which passengers sat in the 16 seats in the middle. Blacks could take the seats only if no whites wanted them. Mrs. Parks action led to the Montgomery bus strike, which was the first large scale, organized protest ag...

Mount Olive College has now become The University of Mount Olive (UMO) Essay

Mount Olive College has now become The University of Mount Olive (UMO) - Essay Example Therefore, everyone believes and trusts that it can indeed make a good university. However, to accomplish this goal, the management of the college needs to have a proper plan. In its strategic plan, the college should carry out an assessment to find out if indeed the college fits to be expanded. After looking at all the available facilities, it should focus on the implications of the expansion and ascertain the right amount of money that needs to be allocated for the exercise. With all these in mind, I would like to express m satisfaction with the feasibility of the project. First and foremost, the expansion of the college will not injure the reputation of the institution. In fact, it will be readily welcome by the general public which will be the number one beneficiary of the new UMO. As it is now, the college has a total size of 250 acres. This is a large size of land that needs to be properly utilized. To effectively do this, expansion should be made to be manageable so as not to overwhelm the management. Meaning, it might not be necessary to acquire more tracks of land as the available one is enough for all the facilities that are required. However, should a need arise; the college may consider increasing its size by acquiring additional plots of land to use in constructing other campuses. Nevertheless, this might not be prioritized as the college has enough campuses at the moment. In terms of costs, I would suggest that the new project would require adequate amount of money to complete. So, I suggest that the management should set aside at least $20 million. This will be used in renovating the available facilities which might be worn out or old enough to be properly used in the new university. Also, part of this money will be used in the construction of more facilities which might not be enough. These include residential halls, college apartments and lecture halls. This will have to be done because the upgrade of the college will